July 14, 2024


Your Partner in The Digital Era

4 Factors Why Python Should not Be the Top Programming Language

4 Factors Why Python Should not Be the Top Programming Language

Periods have never been much better for Python. The language currently ranks as the most popular programming language in the earth, in accordance to the TIOBE Index — a place that demonstrates years of regular advancement about the previous two decades.

That growth stems from a variety of things. A person is the truth that Python — despite its humble origins as an increased shell scripting language — has evolved into just one of the most functional, dynamic languages out there. It can be employed for anything from world-wide-web progress, to web of points (IoT) programming, to AI and over and above. Yet another is that Python code is quite straightforward to generate and execute, which helps make Python a language of alternative for introductory programming courses. Essentially anyone who normally takes Coding 101 at higher education, or attends a coding bootcamp, currently learns Python.

But, component of me wonders how extensive Python’s heyday will last. While you can find unquestionably practically nothing inherently improper with the language, I am in some strategies stunned that it has managed to come to be as well-liked as it has, and I am a little bit doubtful about whether Python will continue being a best programming language 10 or 20 several years from now.

Why, you question? Perfectly, in this article are four good reasons why Python is arguably much more well known than it warrants to be.

1. Python Is Not Quickly

Arguably the programming language’s largest shortcoming is that purposes penned in Python are just not rapid. At minimum, they’re not practically as speedy as those people coded in languages like C or even Java (which is itself not an primarily quick language).

For this explanation, I fear that we are shooting ourselves in the foot a bit by creating so a great deal code in Python. The code may be quick to compose and deploy, but we’re sacrificing pace, efficiency, and efficiency. In a environment in which each and every millisecond counts, Python is just not a great preference.


2. Python’s Syntax Is As well Rigid

Aspect of the reason Python is so well-known, particularly between persons newer to coding, is that it involves a truly precise syntax. That syntax occurs to consequence in code that is quite neat and readable.

This is wonderful if you you should not thoughts having the time to adhere to all of Python’s syntactic procedures. But if you just want to churn out code immediately, Python is likely not the most effective language.

So, if we want to prioritize adaptability and dynamism in excess of obtaining everyone’s code appear quite quite and regular, Python is not the finest language for the long term.

3. Python Offers a Confined Programming Expertise

Yet another portion of the purpose why Python is well-liked with newcomers is that it is really quick to use. You will not have to go your code as a result of a compiler.

The draw back of Python in this respect, on the other hand, is that it won’t in fact give a holistic computer software growth experience. Folks who discover to code in Python are not learning about just about every facet of a common software progress pipeline, and they will facial area a mastering curve if they go on to get the job done with languages that are not interpreted.

In reality — and this may perhaps audio a very little harsh — recognizing how to code in Python is just a single step up from being aware of how to run applications in a Bash shell, which is not coding at all.

From this standpoint, you could argue that Python is developing a generation of programmers who do not essentially know “entire” programming. They just know how to create interpreted code.

4. Nothing at all Seriously Major Has Been Created in Python

This assertion may also spot me in some sizzling drinking water, but I’ll go in advance and make it: As I appear about the planet right now, I do not see any actually massive, intricate, momentous applications or platforms written in Python.

Sure, there are a great deal of big web-sites that use Python in 1 way or a further, mostly on the again end. And there are likely hundreds of thousands of more compact applications out there made in Python.

But there is no Python-primarily based equal to WordPress (despite the fact that there are some Python-based mostly CMSes out there, most of which you have likely not heard of). There is no business office productiveness suite that is dependent heavily on Python. There is definitely no operating method, or even a big aspect of an working system, coded in Python.

This observation isn’t a criticism of Python as a great deal as it is an effort to emphasize the reality that, if Python have been poised to continue to be a leading programming language for many years to arrive, you’d assume anyone would have carried out one thing a lot more appealing with it by now than write scripts and easy apps. But they haven’t, and they likely won’t.


Admittedly, the arguments I have produced above versus Python are all subjective and definitely quite debatable. Plenty of folks are far more bullish about Python than me.

And I am not expressing that Python need to by no means be applied. It undoubtedly has valid use cases. But those people use conditions typically involve composing somewhat easy scripts and applications, not seeking to use Python as the go-to language for writing almost everything under the sunshine.

Immediately after all, as I claimed previously mentioned, Python was designed originally to be basically just a shell scripting language. It has morphed into a a lot much more well known type of monster, and I think that trend will demonstrate to be an anomaly. 10 yrs from now, I suspect we’ll be wanting back again and questioning what we were wondering when we created Python the most preferred programming language in the environment.